fbpx
星期五, 10 月 4, 2024

OPINION: The might of the minority

As the Easter and Anzac weeks are almost at an end, the Prime Minister’s dumping of a capital gains tax proposal already seems like old news.

But what isn’t old news is the structure of our Parliament, where smaller political players can have great influence that seems out of proportion to their size.

In this case, one component part of the Government, New Zealand First, effectively killed the capital gains tax recommendation, even though Labour and the Greens were entrenched in their support for it.

Winston was right to oppose a capital gains tax. The policy was to be revenue-neutral, meaning implementing the tax would have brought in no extra income for the Government.

Why anyone would want to make our relatively simple tax system more complex for no appreciable gain is something I can’t understand.

The uncertainty it would have created, as well as the anti-investment signals it sent, also weren’t good for our wider economy.

But the more important political point worth observing is the high level of influence a relatively small group of voters can have on policy outcomes. This is nothing new.

For six of the almost nine years John Key walked the corridors of Parliament, he governed with effectively a one-seat majority. At any point in time a single MP could hold up policy, or win gains for their local electorate.

Similar situations happened to Helen Clark and Jenny Shipley before him.

We hardly noticed this though because Key was a master of political management, the likes of which the centre-right of politics now sorely misses.

Our electoral system puts single MPs or smaller parties in prime position to support their constituencies. New Zealand First is now sticking up for the people who voted for them.

Attempts to change our electoral system failed in 2011, so this phenomenon won’t differ while we have MMP.

Voters at the next general election will decide which individuals or political parties are able to deliver funding or policy wins for the people they represent. This right of voters can be used wisely and strategically.

Jami-Lee Ross, MP for Botany

By clicking to accept for Times Online to be translated into Mandarin, you accept and acknowledge that it has been translated for your convenience using 3 rd party translation software. No automated translation is perfect, nor is it intended to replace human translators and are provided "as is." No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability, or correctness of any translations made from English into Mandarin. Some content (such as images, videos etc.) may not be accurately translated due to the limitations of the translation software. The official text is the English version of the website. Any discrepancies or differences created in the translation are not binding and have no legal effect and should not be relied on by you for any decision-making purposes. If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information contained in the translated website, refer to the English version of the website which is the official edited version.

点击同意将《时代在线》翻译成中文,即表示您接受并确认,该翻译是使用第三方软件为您方便起见而 提供的。请注意自动翻译并非完美无缺,也不旨在取代人工翻译,只能作为参考而已。对于英文到中文 的任何翻译的准确性、可靠性或正确性,我们不提供任何明示或暗示的保证。由于翻译软件的限制,某 些内容(如图片、视频等)可能无法准确翻译。   英文版本是本网站的官方正式文本。翻译中产生的任何差异或错误均不具有约束力,不具有法律效力, 您不应依赖由自动翻译软件生成的版本做出任何决策。如果对翻译后的网站中包含的信息的准确性有任 何疑问,请参阅本网站的官方编辑英文版本。

- 广告
- 广告

更多信息来自《泰晤士报在线

- 广告

最新

- 广告
- 广告