fbpx
星期日, 11 月 17, 2024

Forget raised crossing, what about footpaths in Flat Bush?

On August 29, Simeon Brown, the MP for Pakuranga, organised a public meeting at Farm Cove Intermediate to discuss the proposed raised crossing on Pakuranga Road.

The meeting was attended by Auckland Transport (AT) officials, Howick ward councillors and about 150 enthusiastic people affected by the proposal. AT officials said to the gathering that 90 per cent of the 1200 respondents consulted earlier opposed the raised crossing design.

In the meeting, participants raised questions from various perspectives. AT appeared to be unable to provide satisfactory answers. As an affected Pakuranga Road user, I am opposed to the raised crossing design because of the following reasons:

While pedestrian safety should be given a high priority, the existing road environment and social context should be considered for this crossing. A raised crossing will over-protect a limited number of pedestrians. It ignores the adverse effects it will have on wider road users such as traffic delays. There are 21,000 vehicles per day at that crossing.

Due to the raised design, vehicles are required to apply brakes even during green traffic lights. There are several other crossings on Pakuranga Road and across the city that are without the humps and seem to be working okay. What is special about this crossing that it has to be raised?

Why would AT designers produce something not acceptable to so many people?

AT said they are working on the Vision Zero campaign. If Vision Zero is the basis for a raised design, AT should be able to demonstrate this vision across the city.

The final outcome may be that a crossing may not be required at this place as there are crossings on each side of Pakuranga Road 300m from this point.

If AT’s norm is Vision Zero, nobody on our roads across the city should be injured or killed. If so, how about several sections of the main roads in Flat Bush which do not have footpaths? School children and people walking to work are forced to walk in the traffic lanes risking their lives.

If completing these footpaths are developer’s responsibilities, how long will people have to wait? We need another public meeting to deal with these life-threatening issues. If a crossing is not required on Pakuranga Road as proposed, I suggest transfer that budget and build footpaths in Flat Bush and other such places across the city where there are road safety issues including potholes.

Yuva Adhikary
Vice President, Flat Bush Ratepayers and Residents Association Inc

By clicking to accept for Times Online to be translated into Mandarin, you accept and acknowledge that it has been translated for your convenience using 3 rd party translation software. No automated translation is perfect, nor is it intended to replace human translators and are provided "as is." No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability, or correctness of any translations made from English into Mandarin. Some content (such as images, videos etc.) may not be accurately translated due to the limitations of the translation software. The official text is the English version of the website. Any discrepancies or differences created in the translation are not binding and have no legal effect and should not be relied on by you for any decision-making purposes. If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information contained in the translated website, refer to the English version of the website which is the official edited version.

点击同意将《时代在线》翻译成中文,即表示您接受并确认,该翻译是使用第三方软件为您方便起见而 提供的。请注意自动翻译并非完美无缺,也不旨在取代人工翻译,只能作为参考而已。对于英文到中文 的任何翻译的准确性、可靠性或正确性,我们不提供任何明示或暗示的保证。由于翻译软件的限制,某 些内容(如图片、视频等)可能无法准确翻译。   英文版本是本网站的官方正式文本。翻译中产生的任何差异或错误均不具有约束力,不具有法律效力, 您不应依赖由自动翻译软件生成的版本做出任何决策。如果对翻译后的网站中包含的信息的准确性有任 何疑问,请参阅本网站的官方编辑英文版本。

- 广告
- 广告

更多信息来自《泰晤士报在线

- 广告

最新

- 广告
- 广告