fbpx
星期二, 11 月 26, 2024

Debate over management of public facility heats up

The Howick Local Board recently debated another issue relating to the Howick War Memorial Hall in Picton Street. The board is comprised of members, from left, Bruce Kendall, Peter Young, Mike Turinsky, Adele White, deputy chair Bo Burns, chairperson Damian Light, John Spiller, Katrina Bungard and David Collings. File photo supplied

The Howick Local Board is again going into a new year without having resolved the contentious long-standing debate over management of a public facility.

Conflict over who should run the Howick War Memorial Hall in Picton Street has been raging for several years with various groups in the community having applied to become its manager.

An attempt by the previous local board to resolve the saga before the 2022 Auckland Council elections failed.

The Picton Street building, commonly known as the Howick Information Centre, was closed along with most council facilities in the first half of 2020 when New Zealand went into its first Covid-19 lockdown.

In late 2021 council staff recommended the local board appoint the Howick Village Association as the preferred applicant to manage it.

That recommendation has gone before the board multiple times but it’s failed to receive sufficient support to pass each time.

The council is currently managing the building as a venue for hire.

An issue relating to the facility arose during one of the board’s final business meetings in late 2023.

Its members were told their Howick Youth Facility and Programmes required additional funding of $130,000 to secure a long-term Youth Space at the Botany Town Centre.

Council staff recommended $82,000 from the budget for the Howick War Memorial Hall and $48,000 from Community Grants Howick be reallocated.

Board chairperson Damian Light said the $82,000 in the hall’s budget was “on pause” as there was currently no activity to spend it on and he supported the recommendation to reallocate the money.

Board member David Collings said he was very supportive of the youth facility, but he’d never seen the board allocate five years of funding in one financial year.

He was surprised its lead financial advisor wasn’t “having a meltdown”, he said.

The financial advisor responded if it’s a multi-year project and there’s a service agreement, “then that serves the purpose”.

Management of the Howick War Memorial Hall in Picton Street has been a contentious issue for several years. Times file photo Wayne Martin

Light asked Collings what his objection was to putting the funding up.

“I go away for a couple of weeks and all of a sudden that money is taken out of that … I don’t want that money to be taken away,” Collings said.

“I fought very hard to keep that money in the first place. You weren’t on the board at the time.

“This is being reallocated out of that budget so there won’t be any money to forward anything to do with the war memorial hall … this financial year.”

Light told Collings he hadn’t answered his question and added: “It’s a real shame you weren’t in the workshop last week when we discussed this in detail. The board had a very robust discussion …”

At that point Collings interrupted Light and talked over him.

After Collings finished speaking, other board members asked questions about the item.

As discussions became heated, member Katrina Bungard asked if the board could take a brief break.

Collings eventually moved an amendment to the original motion. It was not seconded and he withdrew it.

Bungard moved an amendment requesting council staff “investigate a quotation of a facilitation of the reopening of the Howick War Memorial Hall expression of interest process”.

The amendment was not seconded and she withdrew it.

The board voted to approve the reallocation of $130,000 toward the Howick Youth Facility and Programmes.

By clicking to accept for Times Online to be translated into Mandarin, you accept and acknowledge that it has been translated for your convenience using 3 rd party translation software. No automated translation is perfect, nor is it intended to replace human translators and are provided "as is." No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability, or correctness of any translations made from English into Mandarin. Some content (such as images, videos etc.) may not be accurately translated due to the limitations of the translation software. The official text is the English version of the website. Any discrepancies or differences created in the translation are not binding and have no legal effect and should not be relied on by you for any decision-making purposes. If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information contained in the translated website, refer to the English version of the website which is the official edited version.

点击同意将《时代在线》翻译成中文,即表示您接受并确认,该翻译是使用第三方软件为您方便起见而 提供的。请注意自动翻译并非完美无缺,也不旨在取代人工翻译,只能作为参考而已。对于英文到中文 的任何翻译的准确性、可靠性或正确性,我们不提供任何明示或暗示的保证。由于翻译软件的限制,某 些内容(如图片、视频等)可能无法准确翻译。   英文版本是本网站的官方正式文本。翻译中产生的任何差异或错误均不具有约束力,不具有法律效力, 您不应依赖由自动翻译软件生成的版本做出任何决策。如果对翻译后的网站中包含的信息的准确性有任 何疑问,请参阅本网站的官方编辑英文版本。

- 广告
- 广告

更多信息来自《泰晤士报在线

- 广告

最新

- 广告
- 广告