fbpx
星期四, 12 月 26, 2024

OPINION: School donation policy another broken promise

In the Government’s recent budget they announced the removal of school donations for all decile 1-7 schools.

Whilst National has supported this Bill to Select Committee as we believe it is important to reduce costs for parents where possible, we have major concerns about this policy.

Put simply, this policy is a broken promise and simply does not do what Labour said they would.

Labour went to the election saying that they would remove school donations for all schools, however this policy only benefits schools with decile ratings of 1-7 meaning many schools and parents in Pakuranga will not benefit from this policy as 9 of our 21 schools have decile ratings of 8 or above.

While this policy has disappointed many parents and schools who were led to believe donations would be scrapped altogether, it also highlights the inequity in our decile system as a means for funding our schools.

As many schools have said in submissions to Parliament, high decile schools are also home to students from disadvantaged families who do not benefit from this policy.

National believes that by locking out decile 8–10 schools, the Government is fostering inequity.

As Michael Williams, the Principal of Pakuranga College, notes in his submission, ‘At a time where schools are looking more and more to provide authentic learning experiences and to engage more with the world beyond the school gate, this bill could very well have the exact opposite effect.’

Steve Hargreaves, the Principal of Macleans College, said in a submission to Parliament, “The decision to offer Decile 1 to 7 schools an additional $150 payment… makes it clear that decile 8 to 10 schools are expected to make up funding shortfalls from their students’ parents. This $150 payment further increases the difference in per student funding made to schools…”

National had proposed scrapping the decile system altogether due to huge inequities and discrimination. We had also proposed putting in additional funding for schools to compensate any changes this policy might mean to schools operational funding.

Labour has stalled this proposal, and leaving families in communities with higher decile rated schools being hit twice, with inequity from the stalled policy and by being excluded from the donation policy.

Resolving core funding issues is a fairer way of ensuring parents will be asked for donations, as this will mean extra resources are better targeted to support schools to lift achievement. No matter which way you look at it, this Government has shown yet again that we cannot trust it will do what it says or tackle the hard issues.

  • Simeon Brown MP for Pakuranga

By clicking to accept for Times Online to be translated into Mandarin, you accept and acknowledge that it has been translated for your convenience using 3 rd party translation software. No automated translation is perfect, nor is it intended to replace human translators and are provided "as is." No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability, or correctness of any translations made from English into Mandarin. Some content (such as images, videos etc.) may not be accurately translated due to the limitations of the translation software. The official text is the English version of the website. Any discrepancies or differences created in the translation are not binding and have no legal effect and should not be relied on by you for any decision-making purposes. If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information contained in the translated website, refer to the English version of the website which is the official edited version.

点击同意将《时代在线》翻译成中文,即表示您接受并确认,该翻译是使用第三方软件为您方便起见而 提供的。请注意自动翻译并非完美无缺,也不旨在取代人工翻译,只能作为参考而已。对于英文到中文 的任何翻译的准确性、可靠性或正确性,我们不提供任何明示或暗示的保证。由于翻译软件的限制,某 些内容(如图片、视频等)可能无法准确翻译。   英文版本是本网站的官方正式文本。翻译中产生的任何差异或错误均不具有约束力,不具有法律效力, 您不应依赖由自动翻译软件生成的版本做出任何决策。如果对翻译后的网站中包含的信息的准确性有任 何疑问,请参阅本网站的官方编辑英文版本。

- 广告
- 广告

更多信息来自《泰晤士报在线

- 广告

最新

- 广告
- 广告