fbpx
星期二, 11 月 26, 2024

‘Our reserves are not for sale’

Opposing the proposed sale of four east Auckland public reserves are, from left, Botany MP Christopher Luxon, Pakuranga MP Simeon Brown, and Howick ward councillors Sharon Stewart and Paul Young. Times photo Wayne Martin

The fight to stop four east Auckland public reserves from being sold is drawing some heavyweight political support.

Pakuranga MP Simeon Brown and Botany MP Christopher Luxon say they oppose a move by Auckland Council to dispose of the public green spaces in Botany, Pakuranga, Highland Park, and Clover Park.

The council’s finance and performance committee voted in September to dispose of a swath of council-owned properties across the city.

The move is part of an effort to raise $224 million from “asset recycling” through the council’s emergency budget.

Ten properties in the Howick Local Board area the council no longer requires are among those set to be sold.

The board previously voted to support the sale of six of them, but did not endorse the sale of four public reserves at 9R Fortyfoot Lane, 76R Aberfeldy Avenue, 111R Golfland Drive, and 31 Aspiring Avenue/17R Hilltop Road.

However, the finance and performance committee voted to sell all 10 properties, including the four the board wanted to retain.

Howick’s two ward councillors, Sharon Stewart and Paul Young, voted against their sale.
Brown and Luxon say the reserves should not be sold.

It’s ironic the council has deemed the properties “surplus to requirements”, Brown says.

“We have about 130,000 people living in east Auckland already and the population will be about 160,000 by 2030.

“For people to have places to recreate, places to play with their kids and kick a ball around, I don’t see much green space in the backyards of these new properties [that are being built].

“This [the reserves] is what will become the backyards for those kids.

“Getting rid of them means they don’t have those opportunities, which we need to protect.”

The MPs say they also oppose any attempt to develop intensified housing on the reserves.

“We already have issues with this,” Luxon says.

“We have issues at Cockle Bay around intensification where the enabling infrastructure doesn’t support further development.

“These are well built-up areas where we need the green spaces maintained. Where we have seen intensification we haven’t seen good planning.

“It’s not being well thought through and well planned.

“Development is okay if it’s well planned but just chucking apartments into an area that cannot support it can cause problems.”

Young says the council needs to receive feedback from the public on the issue and, if a reserve does not need to be sold, then it should be retained as green space.

Stewart says members of the local community have an opportunity “to come and say something” if they oppose the reserves being sold. “They have to come and speak out.”

Brown says he and Luxon are working to raise awareness of the issue and they will talk to people who live near the four reserves.

“We’ll encourage people to make submissions in opposition [to their sale].

“We need to send a very clear message to Auckland Council that the community does not see these as surplus to requirements.

“These are important community assets. Our reserves are not for sale.”

The council will publicise its intention to revoke the reserve status of the four parks with information about how anyone who objects to their sale can do so.

By clicking to accept for Times Online to be translated into Mandarin, you accept and acknowledge that it has been translated for your convenience using 3 rd party translation software. No automated translation is perfect, nor is it intended to replace human translators and are provided "as is." No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability, or correctness of any translations made from English into Mandarin. Some content (such as images, videos etc.) may not be accurately translated due to the limitations of the translation software. The official text is the English version of the website. Any discrepancies or differences created in the translation are not binding and have no legal effect and should not be relied on by you for any decision-making purposes. If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information contained in the translated website, refer to the English version of the website which is the official edited version.

点击同意将《时代在线》翻译成中文,即表示您接受并确认,该翻译是使用第三方软件为您方便起见而 提供的。请注意自动翻译并非完美无缺,也不旨在取代人工翻译,只能作为参考而已。对于英文到中文 的任何翻译的准确性、可靠性或正确性,我们不提供任何明示或暗示的保证。由于翻译软件的限制,某 些内容(如图片、视频等)可能无法准确翻译。   英文版本是本网站的官方正式文本。翻译中产生的任何差异或错误均不具有约束力,不具有法律效力, 您不应依赖由自动翻译软件生成的版本做出任何决策。如果对翻译后的网站中包含的信息的准确性有任 何疑问,请参阅本网站的官方编辑英文版本。

- 广告
- 广告
Advertisement

更多信息来自《泰晤士报在线

- 广告

最新

- 广告
- 广告