fbpx
星期二, 1 月 7, 2025

Rebranding Three Waters won’t fix bad policy

Pakuranga MP Simeon Brown says the Government’s Three Waters policy takes water assets out of local hands. File image
  • By Simeon Brown, MP for Pakuranga

Last week, the Labour Government announced they were rebranding their Three Waters reforms in an attempt to make it more palatable to New Zealanders.

The problem with this is it’s not the name Kiwis are frustrated with, it’s Labour’s continued attempts to centralise assets that have no business being taken out of local hands.

More importantly, it doesn’t actually solve our water infrastructure issues. All Labour changed in their reforms was increasing the number of entities that will manage water assets from four to 10.

Regional representative groups – that comprise of 50 per cent Māori representation – would then decide who sits on the boards of those entities, with a central Entity Management organisation at the top making all the actual decisions.

These are the same reforms Labour have been trying to push through this whole time, with a new coat of paint and a few more water entities than before.

National agrees we need greater investment into our water assets to ensure they are maintained in a safe and sustainable way for the future.

That’s why we announced our ‘Local Water Done Well’ policy, with real investment into our water infrastructure and stronger central government oversight, but without taking it away from local councils and the communities they represent.

We will require councils to ring-fence money for water infrastructure investment and maintenance instead of spending it on whatever they want and will ensure water services are both environmentally and financially sustainable for future generations.

One of the major issues Kiwis have expressed with Labour’s reforms is that it has never been explained how co-governance helps deliver better water services.

National is strongly of the belief that all New Zealanders should be treated equally in the delivery of public services and that co-governance fundamentally undermines the democratic accountability of these public services.

Co-governance will also only lead to more bureaucracy, something New Zealand needs far less of, and we are already seeing examples of this with the $1 million a month spent on consultants for the new Māori Health Authority.

National opposes the co-governance of public services. We believe all New Zealanders should be treated equally and that we will repeal Labour’s co-governance proposals.

It’s time for Labour to stop their ideological crusade and make policy decisions based on what will actually deliver results for Kiwis

By clicking to accept for Times Online to be translated into Mandarin, you accept and acknowledge that it has been translated for your convenience using 3 rd party translation software. No automated translation is perfect, nor is it intended to replace human translators and are provided "as is." No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability, or correctness of any translations made from English into Mandarin. Some content (such as images, videos etc.) may not be accurately translated due to the limitations of the translation software. The official text is the English version of the website. Any discrepancies or differences created in the translation are not binding and have no legal effect and should not be relied on by you for any decision-making purposes. If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information contained in the translated website, refer to the English version of the website which is the official edited version.

点击同意将《时代在线》翻译成中文,即表示您接受并确认,该翻译是使用第三方软件为您方便起见而 提供的。请注意自动翻译并非完美无缺,也不旨在取代人工翻译,只能作为参考而已。对于英文到中文 的任何翻译的准确性、可靠性或正确性,我们不提供任何明示或暗示的保证。由于翻译软件的限制,某 些内容(如图片、视频等)可能无法准确翻译。   英文版本是本网站的官方正式文本。翻译中产生的任何差异或错误均不具有约束力,不具有法律效力, 您不应依赖由自动翻译软件生成的版本做出任何决策。如果对翻译后的网站中包含的信息的准确性有任 何疑问,请参阅本网站的官方编辑英文版本。

- 广告
- 广告

更多信息来自《泰晤士报在线

- 广告

最新

- 广告
- 广告