fbpx
星期五, 10 月 4, 2024

Open letter to Howick Local Board

Dear Board Members

Without public consultation your predecessors planted 4 Magnolia Grandiflora directly in front of Stockade Hill, and of course they are already interfering in its priceless views. Recently we urged you again to remove them, so you asked Council officers for advice – and confirmed the trees will stay put. Thanks for sending us that Council report, which you refused to give us until we threatened to use the Official Information Act. But now you are barring us from fully addressing your public meetings on the subject. Having read the report, we understand why you didn’t want anyone to see it:
it is a complete whitewash, going to laughable lengths to support your stance. Its claims include:

1. The trees won’t damage the views because they grow to only 6m. Wrong: as juveniles they are already interfering, and our sources say they can grow to 12m. Remember: Stockade Hill only rises to max 8m above the road.

2. Once planted, no tree can be moved. Patently wrong. Check Council’s own wholesale slaughter of Auckland’s Urban Forest, and the hundreds of other trees a week they allow to be removed.

3. It would cost $20K to move them!

4. They are essential as “cooling shade” for Crawford Reserve visitors. Wrong: check the compass: their shadows fall towards the road.

5. This genus provides “pollution mitigation for pedestrians and park users”: Wrong again. They produce significant litter: irritant pollen; flowers, cones and seeds; and they moult big tough leaves year-round.

6. The trees are now too valuable to part with – an unsupported book value of $12,757.31. Wrong. Common sense, please: they have no realisable value.

7. The trees also have political value: they have acquired untouchable “Carbon Credits” against Global Warming! More: “as they grow” their Carbon Credits will increase “exponential(ly)”! But doesn’t that mean an equivalent exponential increase in size? These are the wrong trees.

8. In contradiction, the report also says the trees can be trimmed! They are already tall with long trunks, so it’s too late anyway, but if we did, the tortured things would be lollipops. Wrong tree again.

9. The Magnolias are “protected”. Big time wrong: if Council can sacrifice our local trees, including the 7 doomed Pohutukawa at 34 Moore Street, and if the Tupuna Maunga Authority can remove thousands of non-native trees from the volcanoes, then nothing is protected.

Finally, for the report to suggest that it’s unethical to protect views, and that to undo the error of planting these heritage-destroying trees in front of Stockade Hill will set a precedent, is hugely wrong. Members of the Board: you are deliberately allowing these inappropriately planted trees to damage a heritage icon: this is the actual precedent. Reverse it and replace them. For us, flowers beds or dainty shrubs would be lovely. We’ll help, and next week will be fine, thanks, before it gets even worse.

Howick Ratepayers and Residents Committee and its AGM 15/8/2

By clicking to accept for Times Online to be translated into Mandarin, you accept and acknowledge that it has been translated for your convenience using 3 rd party translation software. No automated translation is perfect, nor is it intended to replace human translators and are provided "as is." No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability, or correctness of any translations made from English into Mandarin. Some content (such as images, videos etc.) may not be accurately translated due to the limitations of the translation software. The official text is the English version of the website. Any discrepancies or differences created in the translation are not binding and have no legal effect and should not be relied on by you for any decision-making purposes. If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information contained in the translated website, refer to the English version of the website which is the official edited version.

点击同意将《时代在线》翻译成中文,即表示您接受并确认,该翻译是使用第三方软件为您方便起见而 提供的。请注意自动翻译并非完美无缺,也不旨在取代人工翻译,只能作为参考而已。对于英文到中文 的任何翻译的准确性、可靠性或正确性,我们不提供任何明示或暗示的保证。由于翻译软件的限制,某 些内容(如图片、视频等)可能无法准确翻译。   英文版本是本网站的官方正式文本。翻译中产生的任何差异或错误均不具有约束力,不具有法律效力, 您不应依赖由自动翻译软件生成的版本做出任何决策。如果对翻译后的网站中包含的信息的准确性有任 何疑问,请参阅本网站的官方编辑英文版本。

- 广告
- 广告

更多信息来自《泰晤士报在线

- 广告

最新

- 广告
- 广告