fbpx
星期五, 10 月 4, 2024

Safer streets

Our street, Fordyce Ave in Sunnyhills, has for the past three years been subjected to the most horrendously divisive and costly pilot project for safer school streets one could ever imagine.

The rationale for this pilot programme was/is to increase safety outside the school, reduce the number of vehicles during peak times and encourage walking and cycling to and from school.

All worthy goals. No one wants to see children injured or worse.

It was made clear to Auckland Transport [AT] at the start of this trial that never in 40 years has there been an accident in what is a pretty quiet street and that any perceived traffic issues, such as illegal parking, and three point turns at morning and afternoon school pickups could be sorted out by heavy fines and general traffic rule enforcement as required.

Despite letters from and meetings with immediate neighbours who were overwhelmingly in favour of just leaving our street in its peaceful and pretty state, AT ploughed ahead with this hugely expensive trial.

So now after three long years, it appears to be completed with two raised speed bumps, one raised crossing, yellow road markings galore, raised concrete no-parking barriers, redesigned side street entries and signage to beat the band.

I have enquired of AT that as this is a pilot scheme, it would be interesting to know what KPIs were used to measure and judge the success or otherwise of it, as the results will no doubt be used to determine where to from here with other schools.

In summary, in terms of safety, it is known there has never been an accident on this street.

The above “safety improvements” have caused cars to now park further away from and out of view of the school where three-point turns occur and children don’t use the school crossing to cross the street.

This is a 50km/h area whereas the school zone is 30 km/h.

The locals have had three years of unnecessary upheaval.

The street was made to look like a road cone factory for three years.

I am told but can’t confirm that the cost of this project stands at $1.4 million that could be far better spent on a whole lot more deserving projects/issues than this white elephant.

Suffice it to say, to date I have received no response from AT.

Perhaps they are grappling with how, in these times of drastic budget cuts and austerity measures, they can justify an outlay of $1.4m to make an already-safe street safer for 15 minutes in the morning and 15 minutes in the afternoon, five days a week.

Bary Williams, Sunnyhills

By clicking to accept for Times Online to be translated into Mandarin, you accept and acknowledge that it has been translated for your convenience using 3 rd party translation software. No automated translation is perfect, nor is it intended to replace human translators and are provided "as is." No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability, or correctness of any translations made from English into Mandarin. Some content (such as images, videos etc.) may not be accurately translated due to the limitations of the translation software. The official text is the English version of the website. Any discrepancies or differences created in the translation are not binding and have no legal effect and should not be relied on by you for any decision-making purposes. If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information contained in the translated website, refer to the English version of the website which is the official edited version.

点击同意将《时代在线》翻译成中文,即表示您接受并确认,该翻译是使用第三方软件为您方便起见而 提供的。请注意自动翻译并非完美无缺,也不旨在取代人工翻译,只能作为参考而已。对于英文到中文 的任何翻译的准确性、可靠性或正确性,我们不提供任何明示或暗示的保证。由于翻译软件的限制,某 些内容(如图片、视频等)可能无法准确翻译。   英文版本是本网站的官方正式文本。翻译中产生的任何差异或错误均不具有约束力,不具有法律效力, 您不应依赖由自动翻译软件生成的版本做出任何决策。如果对翻译后的网站中包含的信息的准确性有任 何疑问,请参阅本网站的官方编辑英文版本。

- 广告
- 广告
上一篇文章
下一篇文章

更多信息来自《泰晤士报在线

- 广告

最新

- 广告
- 广告